Higher-order thinking skills are great; they are what we all should strive to facilitate in our students, children and world leaders. Synthesis and evaluation of our visual environment is at the heart of the latest and greatest in art education; Visual Culture. My problem though with all latest and greatest saviors of our childrens’ education, (largely written by lab coats who don’t really seem to have actual contact with (ewww!!!) real kids) is that these new writings rarely pay the respect due to what has come before, and often must lie under these higher order goals. If you’re talking about classroom discipline and control, believe it or not, a little behavior mod has to be a part of the equation that will hopefully, maybe before the end of the first quarter, more fully function by intrinsic control. If you want kids to analyze the birth and growth of the civil rights movement, a little rote memorization of some important dates and names from Abe Lincoln on is a helpful ingredient in the mix for a foundation upon which an analysis can be based. And believe it or not, great gurus of Visual Culture Education, experience and confidence in formal analysis and media manipulation is an instructive place to start if we want our kids to really notice and think about their visual world.
When I teach people, young and old, to interact with works of art, which includes their cars, tennis shoes and office buildings, I first facilitate observation and description. What do you see? Give me adjectives, adverbs and similies. Think about what associations these descriptions bring to mind. Connect with your descriptions, then you will find you are connecting with the art. Knowledge and Comprehension (looking and describing), Application and Analysis (connecting what you see to other aspects of your world and experience), Synthesis and Evaluation (creating and expressing a personal response and interpretation to the work of art). This is how I see Mr Bloom’s intended taxonomy; higher-order thinking is hollow without lower-order basis. Even after all the hours I have spent looking at art from around the world, I try to not immediately interpret the art (I wasn’t around in China a thousand years ago, how can I possibly truly interpret?!) but rather I interpret my description of and connection to the art Be it a thousand years old Chinese temple sculpture, or my child’s drawing.
So last summer I noticed, while sitting on my front step, what I immediately described as being very much like the yellow baby-barf stain that all parents know, on my right shoulder. The problem was that I didn’t have a stain on my shoulder. When I looked down, it was gone. A few weeks later, in synagogue during Rosh Hashanah services, I noticed the bright purple glow coming from the prayer book of the lady to my right. It was very cool and neon, like a scene from a fantasy movie about a magic book. Trouble was, it really wasn’t glowing at all. It was the same prayer book as mine. This kind of thing went on and, while I knew it wasn’t right, it was not in my way and was actually kinda cool. It was not until a few weeks later that I noticed while taking a shower that the vertical tile grout lines to my right bowed and waved like a Bridget Riley painting and realized I should probably have this looked into (pun intended).
A trip to the opthamologist led to a trip to a retinal specialist, which leads me here. And not really knowing where “here” is is punishing. Except “punishment” is a behavior mod thing right? No, that avenue won’t take me anywhere.
I meet today with a member of our Museum IT department. My hope is that Kyle will buy into my goal of making my New Dimensions program Web 2.0 active. Creating and expressing personal responses to the Museum’s collection, based on careful observation, and creating on-going dialogues involving people around the world who have never heard of The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art about the art. Spreading the Museum, the art and the kids expressions around the world,
like a cancer.
I just got the call to set up an appointment to meet with the retinal guy to talk about my MRI next Tuesday, 4 days away.
d